Browse   byTaxon | Subject


Browse by Region
World
Europe
Asia
Australasia
Africa
Americas
Pacific
Polar
Oceans
None

Browse by
Issue
Author
Article

List of Journals

Our Services
Web Services
For Authors
For Librarians
For Booksellers
For Publishers

Home About Pensoft Books E-Books Journals Email/RSS Alerts News Contact Register/Log In
in by
(0 items)

| Journal Home | About | Journal Search | Current Issue | All Issues |
Comparative Cytogenetics

Comparative Cytogenetics 4 (1) (2010) : 79-85

Biogeographical karyotypic variation of Rhinophylla fischerae (Chiroptera: Phyllostomidae) suggests the occurrence of cryptic species

A Gomes, L Rodrigues, J Rissino, C Nagamachi, J Pieczarka
doi: 10.3897/compcytogen.v4i1.24
Published: 09.07.2010

Viewed by: 557
Abstract

The genus Rhinophylla Peters, 1865 (Carolliinae: Phyllostomidae) comprises three species: R. pumilio Peters, 1865, R. fischerae Carter, 1966 and R. alethina Handley, 1966. Only the first two species have been cytogenetically studied to date. Previous studies on specimens of Rhinophylla fischerae from two populations from East of Andes (Colombia) showed the karyotype with 2n=34 and FN=56. In this paper, we report the results of cytogenetic analysis of six specimens of Rhinophylla fischerae from Brazil. Probably chromosomal differences can be found among the populations because of the geographic distance. Metaphase chromosomes were obtained in the field by direct extraction of bone marrow. The metaphases were analyzed by conventional staining, G- and C-banding, NOR-staining and FISH with telomeric probes. Rhinophylla fischerae has 2n=38 and Fundamental Number FN=68, with small amounts of constitutive heterochromatin in the centromeric regions of the chromosomes and the long arm of pair 16. Fluorescence in situ hybridization using telomeric probes did not show any interstitial sequences. Hybridization with human 18S and 28S rDNA probes and silver staining revealed the presence of Nucleolar Organizer Regions at the long arms of pairs 16 and 18. The pattern of G-banding showed that this population had a huge chromosome variation compared with previous studies on specimens of Rhinophylla fischerae. The chromosomal differences among populations that have been morphologically classified as R. fischerae suggest that this species should be considered a cryptic species complex, and that the populations from different geographical regions analyzed to date should be considered species of this complex, where the chromosomal rearrangements had key importance.

Full text: PDF

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 (CC-BY).
Tools
Abstract
PDF
Supplementary files
Order reprints
Download citation

Comments
  Make a comment

Post this Article
Notify colleague
Email the author

Article Views
Viewed by : 557
Most visited papers

Related Information
Taxa
Mammalia: 23 article(s) 236 book(s)
Geographical coverage
South America: 5 article(s) 24 book(s) 7 e-book(s) 19 e-chapter(s)
Website design and publishing framework: Copyright © 2012 Pensoft Publishers | Contact us